View Bill 17-18-07

Senate Bill 17-18-07

Bill ID: 17-18-07
Name: Interim University of Maryland Policy and Procedures Concerning Research Misconduct
Proposed: 08/17/2017
Sponsor: John Bertot, Associate Provost for Faculty Affairs
Proposal: The University of Maryland Policy and Procedures Concerning Research Misconduct is significantly out-of-date and is not aligned with current requirements. The revised policy was approved by President Loh on an interim basis on June 29, 2017, pending Senate review.
Active?Yes
Policy: https://president.umd.edu/administration/policies/section-iii-academic-affairs/iii-110a

Status

Status: Under Review
Under Review By: Faculty Affairs Committee
Received: 08/27/2018
Decision Due By: 01/15/2019
Actions: The Faculty Affairs Committee's Research Misconduct Working Group continued to refine its proposed revisions to the interim policy in summer 2018. The Faculty Affairs Committee received and reviewed proposed revisions to the interim policy from the Working Group in October 2018. The Faculty Affairs Committee began gathering feedback on the substantive issues within the policy from affected stakeholder groups. The chair of the committee presented to the Senate on November 14, 2018 on the interim policy and the preliminary directions of the committee, to gather feedback from the Senate.
Next Step: SEC Review


History

Reviewed By: Senate Executive Committee (SEC)
Received: 08/20/2018
Decision Date: 08/27/2018
Decision: The SEC voted to grant the extension.
Actions: The SEC reviewed the Faculty Affairs Committee's request for an extension at its August 27, 2018, meeting. The SEC voted to grant the Faculty Affairs Committee an extension until January 15, 2019.
Next Step: Faculty Affairs Committee Review
Related Files:


Reviewed By: Faculty Affairs Committee
Received: 08/29/2017
Decision Date: 08/20/2018
Decision Due By: 03/30/2018
Decision: The Faculty Affairs Committee decided to submit a request for an extension.
Actions: The Faculty Affairs Committee created a Research Misconduct Working Group in January 2018 to begin addressing the charge. The Working Group included representation from the Faculty Affairs Committee, the Research Council, and the Division of Research. The Working Group met consistently through the spring 2018 semester and continued work during summer 2018. The Working Group reviewed peer institution policies and consulted with the Office of General Counsel, the Research Council, and the Vice President for Research. The Working Group gave updates to the Faculty Affairs Committee throughout its review. Due to the complexity of the review, the Faculty Affairs Committee was unable to meet its deadline and determined that an extension would be needed.
Next Step: SEC Review
Related Files:


Reviewed By: Senate Executive Committee (SEC)
Received: 08/22/2017
Decision Date: 08/29/2017
Decision: The SEC voted to charge the Faculty Affairs Committee with review of the interim policy.
Actions: The SEC considered the interim policy on research misconduct at its meeting on August 29, 2017. After discussion, the SEC voted to charge the Faculty Affairs Committee with working with the Research Council to consider the interim policy.
Next Step: Faculty Affairs Committee Review